Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations

This source preferred by Tim Slattery

Authors: Slattery, T.J. and Parker, A.J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32582/

Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

eISSN: 1531-5320

ISSN: 1069-9384

DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3

© 2019, The Author(s). Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading.

This data was imported from PubMed:

Authors: Slattery, T.J. and Parker, A.J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32582/

Journal: Psychon Bull Rev

Volume: 26

Issue: 6

Pages: 1948-1957

eISSN: 1531-5320

DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3

Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading.

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Slattery, T.J. and Parker, A.J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32582/

Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volume: 26

Issue: 6

Pages: 1948-1957

eISSN: 1531-5320

ISSN: 1069-9384

DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3

© 2019, The Author(s). Models of eye-movement control during reading focus on reading single lines of text. However, with multiline texts, return sweeps, which bring fixation from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, occur regularly and influence ~20% of all reading fixations. Our understanding of return sweeps is still limited. One common feature of return sweeps is the prevalence of oculomotor errors. Return sweeps, often initially undershoot the start of the line. Corrective saccades then bring fixation closer to the line start. The fixation occurring between the undershoot and the corrective saccade (undersweep-fixation) has important theoretical implications for the serial nature of lexical processing during reading, as they occur on words ahead of the intended attentional target. Furthermore, since the attentional target of a return sweep will lie far outside the parafovea during the prior fixation, it cannot be lexically preprocessed during this prior fixation. We explore the implications of undersweep-fixations for ongoing processing and models of eye movements during reading by analysing two existing eye-movement data sets of multiline reading.

This data was imported from Web of Science (Lite):

Authors: Slattery, T.J. and Parker, A.J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32582/

Journal: PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW

Volume: 26

Issue: 6

Pages: 1948-1957

eISSN: 1531-5320

ISSN: 1069-9384

DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3

The data on this page was last updated at 05:30 on November 25, 2020.