Corrigendum to “Identifying ancient water availability through phytolith analysis: An experimental approach” (Identifying ancient water availability through phytolith analysis: An experimental approach (2016) 73 (82–93), (S0305440316300930), (10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.006))

Authors: Jenkins, E., Jamjoum, K., Nuimat, S., Stafford, R., Nortcliff, S. and Mithen, S.

Journal: Journal of Archaeological Science

Volume: 110

eISSN: 1095-9238

ISSN: 0305-4403

DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2019.104995

Abstract:

The authors regret an error in the paper that does not affect the efficacy of the method. In the paper, we state that the ratio of phytolith forms calculated is the ratio of fixed (short) to sensitive (long) forms when in fact what is calculated is the ratio of sensitive to fixed forms. The authors would like to apologise for any confusion caused.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34228/

Source: Scopus

Identifying ancient water availability through phytolith analysis: An experimental approach (vol 73, pg 82, 2016)

Authors: Jenkins, E., Jamjoum, K., Nuimat, S., Stafford, R., Nortcliff, S. and Mithen, S.

Journal: JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE

Volume: 110

eISSN: 1095-9238

ISSN: 0305-4403

DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2019.104995

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34228/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Corrigendum to “Identifying ancient water availability through phytolith analysis: An experimental approach” (Identifying ancient water availability through phytolith analysis: An experimental approach (2016) 73 (82–93), (S0305440316300930), (10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.006))

Authors: Jenkins, E.L., Jamjoum, K., Nuimat, S., Stafford, R., Nortcliff, S. and Mithen, S.

Journal: Journal of Archaeological Science

Volume: 110

Issue: October

ISSN: 0305-4403

Abstract:

© 2019 The Author(s) The authors regret an error in the paper that does not affect the efficacy of the method. In the paper, we state that the ratio of phytolith forms calculated is the ratio of fixed (short) to sensitive (long) forms when in fact what is calculated is the ratio of sensitive to fixed forms. The authors would like to apologise for any confusion caused.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34228/

Source: BURO EPrints