Using the method of normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks: some observations
Authors: Chowdhury, M.
Journal: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume: 45
Issue: 5
Pages: 643-650
eISSN: 1469-297X
ISSN: 0260-2938
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686606
Abstract:The method of normalisation combined with peer ratings is utilised to provide the solution to the biased rating problem of mapping group work marks to individual marks. We critically evaluate the method of normalisation following the findings of an article which argued against the use of self and/or peer rating mechanism. We demonstrate that the findings of that article also hold for the method of normalisation as the influence of human behavioural factors are not accommodated in the designs. Additionally, we argue that the method (and its variants) is rather complicated, where all possible contingencies are not pre-specified. It makes the arrangement between tutors and students in conducting peer assessments incomplete and unverifiable by a third party.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32977/
Source: Scopus
Using the method of normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks: some observations
Authors: Chowdhury, M.
Journal: ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume: 45
Issue: 5
Pages: 643-650
eISSN: 1469-297X
ISSN: 0260-2938
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686606
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32977/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Using the method of Normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks: Some observations
Authors: Chowdhury, M.
Journal: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0260-2938
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686606
Abstract:The method of normalisation combined with peer ratings is utilised to provide the solution to the biased rating problem of mapping group work marks to individual marks. We critically evaluate the method of normalisation following the findings of an article of the author which argued against the use of self and/or peer rating mechanism. We demonstrate that the findings of that article also hold for the method of normalisation as the influence of human behavioural factors are not accommodated in the designs. Additionally, we argue that the method (and its variants) is rather complicated, where all possible contingencies are not pre-specified. It makes the arrangement between tutors and students in conducting peer assessments incomplete and unverifiable by a third party.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32977/
Source: Manual
Using the method of Normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks: Some observations
Authors: Chowdhury, M.
Journal: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume: 45
Issue: 5
Pages: 643-650
ISSN: 0260-2938
Abstract:The method of normalisation combined with peer ratings is utilised to provide the solution to the biased rating problem of mapping group work marks to individual marks. We critically evaluate the method of normalisation following the findings of an article of the author which argued against the use of self and/or peer rating mechanism. We demonstrate that the findings of that article also hold for the method of normalisation as the influence of human behavioural factors are not accommodated in the designs. Additionally, we argue that the method (and its variants) is rather complicated, where all possible contingencies are not pre-specified. It makes the arrangement between tutors and students in conducting peer assessments incomplete and unverifiable by a third party.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32977/
Source: BURO EPrints