A pragmatic framework for the cognitive study of documentary
Authors: Brylla, C. and Kramer, M.
Journal: Projections (New York)
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 159-180
eISSN: 1934-9696
ISSN: 1934-9688
DOI: 10.3167/proj.2018.120216
Abstract:Traditionally, there has been little intersection between cognitive film theory and documentary studies. This article initially outlines the main reasons for this lacuna, but it also highlights the few existing exceptions. While these remain too embryonic to initiate a large, overarching, and evolving discourse, they constitute seminal landmarks and stepping stones for the future of cognitive documentary studies, which, as we argue, needs to be a pragmatic endeavor. Based on this premise, we propose a research framework consisting of four areas of interest: the mediation of realities; character engagement; emotion and embodied experience; and documentary practice. This framework takes into account intratextual and extratextual aspects in relation to documentary production and reception, as well as potential social impacts.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33028/
Source: Scopus
A Pragmatic Framework for the Cognitive Study of Documentary
Authors: Brylla, C. and Kramer, M.
Journal: PROJECTIONS-THE JOURNAL FOR MOVIES AND MIND
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 159-180
eISSN: 1934-9696
ISSN: 1934-9688
DOI: 10.3167/proj.2018.120216
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33028/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
A pragmatic framework for the cognitive study of documentary
Authors: Brylla, C. and Kramer, M.
Journal: Projections (New York)
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 159-180
eISSN: 1934-9696
ISSN: 1934-9688
DOI: 10.3167/proj.2018.120216
Abstract:© Berghahn Books. Traditionally, there has been little intersection between cognitive film theory and documentary studies. This article initially outlines the main reasons for this lacuna, but it also highlights the few existing exceptions. While these remain too embryonic to initiate a large, overarching, and evolving discourse, they constitute seminal landmarks and stepping stones for the future of cognitive documentary studies, which, as we argue, needs to be a pragmatic endeavor. Based on this premise, we propose a research framework consisting of four areas of interest: the mediation of realities; character engagement; emotion and embodied experience; and documentary practice. This framework takes into account intratextual and extratextual aspects in relation to documentary production and reception, as well as potential social impacts.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33028/
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Catalin Brylla
A pragmatic framework for the cognitive study of documentary
Authors: Brylla, C. and Kramer, M.
Journal: Projections (New York)
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 159-180
ISSN: 1934-9688
Abstract:© Berghahn Books. Traditionally, there has been little intersection between cognitive film theory and documentary studies. This article initially outlines the main reasons for this lacuna, but it also highlights the few existing exceptions. While these remain too embryonic to initiate a large, overarching, and evolving discourse, they constitute seminal landmarks and stepping stones for the future of cognitive documentary studies, which, as we argue, needs to be a pragmatic endeavor. Based on this premise, we propose a research framework consisting of four areas of interest: the mediation of realities; character engagement; emotion and embodied experience; and documentary practice. This framework takes into account intratextual and extratextual aspects in relation to documentary production and reception, as well as potential social impacts.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33028/
Source: BURO EPrints