The Use of Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, to Elicit the Effectiveness of Cancer Support Services in the Southwest of England.
Authors: Evans, G., Hamerston, L., Cherrett, L.M. and Sadd, D.
Journal: International Journal of Systems and Society
Volume: 5
Issue: 2
Pages: 13-29
ISSN: 2327-3984
DOI: 10.4018/IJSS.2018070102
Abstract:This article summarises the findings of a systemic analysis of Living Well and Active's coordination and delivery of physical activity, health and well-being interventions for those living with cancer in the Southwest of England. The 16-month analysis was informed by cancer charities, consultants, healthcare professionals, local government officers, patients and physical activity health and well-being deliverers. Whilst the findings proved there were pockets of good practice such as interventions delivery, organisations were found to be operating in a fragmented way, were resource starved and struggling to make sense of the top-down imposed healthcare policy changes. This meant the cancer referral process only captured 1:10 cancer survivors who could be assisted on their pathway to normalisation. However, participants' conceptualised a different cancer referral process and a hub of practice similar to Living Well and Active to lead physical activity, health and well-being interventions, to improve the 1:10 cancer referral process.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33164/
Source: Manual
The use of systems thinking, systems practice, to elicit the effectiveness of cancer support services in the Southwest of England.
Authors: Evans, G., Hamerston, L., Cherrett, L.M. and Sadd, D.
Journal: International Journal of Systems and Society
Volume: 5
Issue: 2
Pages: 13-29
ISSN: 2327-3984
Abstract:This article summarises the findings of a systemic analysis of Living Well and Active's coordination and delivery of physical activity, health and well-being interventions for those living with cancer in the Southwest of England. The 16-month analysis was informed by cancer charities, consultants, healthcare professionals, local government officers, patients and physical activity health and well-being deliverers. Whilst the findings proved there were pockets of good practice such as interventions delivery, organisations were found to be operating in a fragmented way, were resource starved and struggling to make sense of the top-down imposed healthcare policy changes. This meant the cancer referral process only captured 1:10 cancer survivors who could be assisted on their pathway to normalisation. However, participants' conceptualised a different cancer referral process and a hub of practice similar to Living Well and Active to lead physical activity, health and well-being interventions, to improve the 1:10 cancer referral process.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33164/
Source: BURO EPrints