Researchnotes.
Authors: Gelling, L.
Journal: Nurs Stand
Volume: 19
Issue: 23
Pages: 23
eISSN: 2047-9018
DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30
Abstract:Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.
Source: PubMed
A fresh look at risk could revitalise student research
Authors: Gelling, L.
Journal: Nursing Standard
Volume: 19
Issue: 23
Pages: 23
Publisher: Royal College of Nursing
eISSN: 2047-9018
ISSN: 0029-6570
DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30
Abstract:Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Leslie Gelling
Researchnotes.
Authors: Gelling, L.
Journal: Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
Volume: 19
Issue: 23
Pages: 23
eISSN: 2047-9018
ISSN: 0029-6570
DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30
Abstract:Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.
Source: Europe PubMed Central