Researchnotes.

Authors: Gelling, L.

Journal: Nurs Stand

Volume: 19

Issue: 23

Pages: 23

eISSN: 2047-9018

DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30

Abstract:

Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.

Source: PubMed

A fresh look at risk could revitalise student research

Authors: Gelling, L.

Journal: Nursing Standard

Volume: 19

Issue: 23

Pages: 23

Publisher: Royal College of Nursing

eISSN: 2047-9018

ISSN: 0029-6570

DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30

Abstract:

Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.

Source: Manual

Preferred by: Leslie Gelling

Researchnotes.

Authors: Gelling, L.

Journal: Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

Volume: 19

Issue: 23

Pages: 23

eISSN: 2047-9018

ISSN: 0029-6570

DOI: 10.7748/ns.19.23.23.s30

Abstract:

Advances in research governance and the blending of processes for seeking ethical approval have created a climate dominated by risk aversion. Ethics committees focus their efforts on ensuring risks to participants are proportional to the potential benefits. Unfortunately, the same degree of proportionality is not afforded to the review of low-risk research, much of it coming from the nursing profession.

Source: Europe PubMed Central