Orthographic Neighborhood Effects During Lateralized Lexical Decision Are Abolished With Bilateral Presentation
Authors: Mills, R., Woodhead, Z.V.J. and Parker, A.J.
Journal: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 481-496
eISSN: 1939-1277
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000997
Abstract:Words presented to the right visual field (RVF) are processed more rapidly than those in the left visual field (LVF), presumably because of more direct links to the language dominant left cerebral hemisphere. This effect is moderated by a word’s orthographic neighborhood size (N), with LVF facilitation and RVF inhibition for words with a large N. Across two experiments, we sought to further examine lateralized N effects. Experiment 1 examined how hemispheric dominance for language influenced lateralized N effects, in 140 left-handers using a visual half-field task with bilateral presentation. Neither participants with a right ear advantage on a dichotic listening task nor participants with no right ear advantage showed the expected N effect, making the results ambiguous: it could be that left-handers fail to show N effects, or the effect could be abolished by some procedural aspect. Experiment 2 looked to test these options by testing 56 right-handers who responded to the same stimulus set under the original bilateral presentation condition and under unilateral presentation. N effects were found under unilateral but not bilateral presentation. We had adopted bilateral presentation because it had been recommended as better than unilateral presentation for controlling fixation and visual stimulation; our results indicate that this is not a minor methodological modification: it can dramatically affect lateralized N effects.
Source: Scopus
Orthographic neighborhood effects during lateralized lexical decision are abolished with bilateral presentation.
Authors: Mills, R., Woodhead, Z.V.J. and Parker, A.J.
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 481-496
eISSN: 1939-1277
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000997
Abstract:Words presented to the right visual field (RVF) are processed more rapidly than those in the left visual field (LVF), presumably because of more direct links to the language dominant left cerebral hemisphere. This effect is moderated by a word's orthographic neighborhood size (N), with LVF facilitation and RVF inhibition for words with a large N. Across two experiments, we sought to further examine lateralized N effects. Experiment 1 examined how hemispheric dominance for language influenced lateralized N effects, in 140 left-handers using a visual half-field task with bilateral presentation. Neither participants with a right ear advantage on a dichotic listening task nor participants with no right ear advantage showed the expected N effect, making the results ambiguous: it could be that left-handers fail to show N effects, or the effect could be abolished by some procedural aspect. Experiment 2 looked to test these options by testing 56 right-handers who responded to the same stimulus set under the original bilateral presentation condition and under unilateral presentation. N effects were found under unilateral but not bilateral presentation. We had adopted bilateral presentation because it had been recommended as better than unilateral presentation for controlling fixation and visual stimulation; our results indicate that this is not a minor methodological modification: it can dramatically affect lateralized N effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Source: PubMed
Orthographic Neighborhood Effects During Lateralized Lexical Decision Are Abolished With Bilateral Presentation
Authors: Mills, R., Woodhead, Z.V.J. and Parker, A.J.
Journal: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 481-496
eISSN: 1939-1277
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000997
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Orthographic neighborhood effects during lateralized lexical decision are abolished with bilateral presentation.
Authors: Mills, R., Woodhead, Z.V.J. and Parker, A.J.
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 481-496
eISSN: 1939-1277
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000997
Abstract:Words presented to the right visual field (RVF) are processed more rapidly than those in the left visual field (LVF), presumably because of more direct links to the language dominant left cerebral hemisphere. This effect is moderated by a word's orthographic neighborhood size (N), with LVF facilitation and RVF inhibition for words with a large N. Across two experiments, we sought to further examine lateralized N effects. Experiment 1 examined how hemispheric dominance for language influenced lateralized N effects, in 140 left-handers using a visual half-field task with bilateral presentation. Neither participants with a right ear advantage on a dichotic listening task nor participants with no right ear advantage showed the expected N effect, making the results ambiguous: it could be that left-handers fail to show N effects, or the effect could be abolished by some procedural aspect. Experiment 2 looked to test these options by testing 56 right-handers who responded to the same stimulus set under the original bilateral presentation condition and under unilateral presentation. N effects were found under unilateral but not bilateral presentation. We had adopted bilateral presentation because it had been recommended as better than unilateral presentation for controlling fixation and visual stimulation; our results indicate that this is not a minor methodological modification: it can dramatically affect lateralized N effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Source: Europe PubMed Central