Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich.

Authors: Hardman, D. and Hutchinson, P.

Journal: J Med Ethics

eISSN: 1473-4257

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108304

Abstract:

In our article, Where the ethical action is, we argue that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but merely different aspects of a clinical situation. In response, Emmerich argues that in so doing, we neglect several important features of healthcare and medical education. Although we applaud the spirit of Emmerich's response, we argue that his critique is an attempt at a general defence of the value of bioethical expertise in clinical practice, rather than a specific critique of our account.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36936/

Source: PubMed

Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich Response

Authors: Hardman, D. and Hutchinson, P.

Journal: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS

eISSN: 1473-4257

ISSN: 0306-6800

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108304

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36936/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich

Authors: Hardman, D. and Hutchinson, P.

Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics

Publisher: BMJ

ISSN: 0306-6800

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108304

Abstract:

In our article, Where the ethical action is, we argue that that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but merely different aspects of a clinical situation. In response, Emmerich argues that in so doing we neglect several important features of healthcare and medical education. Although we applaud the spirit of Emmerich’s response, we argue that his critique is an attempt at a general defence of the value of bioethical expertise in clinical practice, rather than a specific critique of our account.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36936/

Source: Manual

Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich.

Authors: Hardman, D. and Hutchinson, P.

Journal: Journal of medical ethics

Pages: medethics-2022-108304

eISSN: 1473-4257

ISSN: 0306-6800

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108304

Abstract:

In our article, Where the ethical action is, we argue that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but merely different aspects of a clinical situation. In response, Emmerich argues that in so doing, we neglect several important features of healthcare and medical education. Although we applaud the spirit of Emmerich's response, we argue that his critique is an attempt at a general defence of the value of bioethical expertise in clinical practice, rather than a specific critique of our account.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36936/

Source: Europe PubMed Central

Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich.

Authors: Hardman, D. and Hutchinson, P.

Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics

Publisher: BMJ

ISSN: 0306-6800

Abstract:

In our article, Where the ethical action is, we argue that that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but merely different aspects of a clinical situation. In response, Emmerich argues that in so doing we neglect several important features of healthcare and medical education. Although we applaud the spirit of Emmerich’s response, we argue that his critique is an attempt at a general defence of the value of bioethical expertise in clinical practice, rather than a specific critique of our account.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36936/

Source: BURO EPrints