Using a Range of Communication Tools to Interview a Hard-to-Reach Population

Authors: Harvey, O., van Teijlingen, E. and Parrish, M.

Journal: Sociological Research Online

Volume: 29

Issue: 1

Pages: 221-232

eISSN: 1360-7804

DOI: 10.1177/13607804221142212

Abstract:

Online communication tools are increasingly being used by qualitative researchers; hence it is timely to reflect on the differences when using a broad range of data collection methods. Using a case study with a potentially hard-to-reach substance-using population who are often distrustful of researchers, this article explores the use of a variety of different platforms for interviews. It highlights both the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Face-to-face interviews and online videos offer more opportunity to build rapport, but lack anonymity. Live Webchat and audio-only interviews offer a high level of anonymity, but both may incur a loss of non-verbal communication, and in the Webchat a potential loss of personal narrative. This article is intended for sociologists who wish to broaden their methods for conducting research interviews.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38206/

Source: Scopus

Using a Range of Communication Tools to Interview a Hard-to-Reach Population

Authors: Harvey, O., van Teijlingen, E. and Parrish, M.

Journal: SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE

ISSN: 1360-7804

DOI: 10.1177/13607804221142212

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38206/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Using a Range of Communication Tools to Interview a Hard-to-Reach Population

Authors: Harvey, O., Parrish, M. and van Teijlingen, E.

Journal: Sociological Research Online

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38206/

Source: Manual

Using a range of communication tools to interview a hard-to-reach population

Authors: Harvey, O., van Teijlingen, E. and Parrish, M.

Journal: Sociological Research Online

ISSN: 1360-7804

Abstract:

Online communication tools are increasingly being used by qualitative researchers; hence it is timely to reflect on the differences when using a broad range of data collection methods. Using a case study with a potentially hard-to-reach substance-using population who are often distrustful of researchers, this article explores the use of a variety of different platforms for interviews. It highlights both the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Face-to-face interviews and online videos offer more opportunity to build rapport, but lack anonymity. Live Webchat and audio-only interviews offer a high level of anonymity, but both may incur a loss of non-verbal communication, and in the Webchat a potential loss of personal narrative. This article is intended for sociologists who wish to broaden their methods for conducting research interviews.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38206/

Source: BURO EPrints