Does fruit and vegetable consumption impact mental health? Systematic review and meta-analyses of published controlled intervention studies
Authors: Appleton, K.M., Boxall, L.R., Adenuga-Ajayi, O. and Seyar, D.F.
Journal: British Journal of Nutrition
Volume: 131
Issue: 1
Pages: 163-173
eISSN: 1475-2662
ISSN: 0007-1145
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114523001423
Abstract:Associations between fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption and mental health are suggested, largely from observational studies. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarise all published controlled intervention studies investigating the effects of FV consumption on mental health in adults. Four academic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched on 16 September 2022, over all years, for studies that used an intervention design; included FV consumption; included an appropriate non-FV-consumption control; used a validated measure of mental health and were conducted in healthy adults or adults with solely a depressive or anxiety-related condition. Study details were tabulated and combined using meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the domains of the Cochrane Collaboration. Six studies, enrolling 691 healthy adults and reporting on one or more mental health outcomes, were found. Meta-analyses found small and imprecise effects of FV consumption for: psychological well-being (4 studies, 289 participants) standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0·07 (95 % CI -0·17, 0·30), P = 0·58, I2 = 0 %; depressive symptomology (3 studies, 271 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·40, 0·10), P = 0·23, I2 = 47 % and anxiety-related symptomology (4 studies, 298 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·39, 0·08), P = 0·20, I2 = 71 %. Some benefit for psychological well-being was found in change-from-baseline data: SMD = 0·28 (95 % CI 0·05, 0·52), P = 0·02, I2 = 0 %. Risk of bias was high in many studies. Limitations include the consideration only of published studies and stem from the studies found. Given the few, limited studies available and the small size of effects, stronger evidence is needed before recommending FV consumption for mental health.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38754/
Source: Scopus
Does fruit and vegetable consumption impact mental health? Systematic review and meta-analyses of published controlled intervention studies.
Authors: Appleton, K.M., Boxall, L.R., Adenuga-Ajayi, O. and Seyar, D.F.
Journal: Br J Nutr
Volume: 131
Issue: 1
Pages: 163-173
eISSN: 1475-2662
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114523001423
Abstract:Associations between fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption and mental health are suggested, largely from observational studies. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarise all published controlled intervention studies investigating the effects of FV consumption on mental health in adults. Four academic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched on 16 September 2022, over all years, for studies that used an intervention design; included FV consumption; included an appropriate non-FV-consumption control; used a validated measure of mental health and were conducted in healthy adults or adults with solely a depressive or anxiety-related condition. Study details were tabulated and combined using meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the domains of the Cochrane Collaboration. Six studies, enrolling 691 healthy adults and reporting on one or more mental health outcomes, were found. Meta-analyses found small and imprecise effects of FV consumption for: psychological well-being (4 studies, 289 participants) standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0·07 (95 % CI -0·17, 0·30), P = 0·58, I2 = 0 %; depressive symptomology (3 studies, 271 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·40, 0·10), P = 0·23, I2 = 47 % and anxiety-related symptomology (4 studies, 298 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·39, 0·08), P = 0·20, I2 = 71 %. Some benefit for psychological well-being was found in change-from-baseline data: SMD = 0·28 (95 % CI 0·05, 0·52), P = 0·02, I2 = 0 %. Risk of bias was high in many studies. Limitations include the consideration only of published studies and stem from the studies found. Given the few, limited studies available and the small size of effects, stronger evidence is needed before recommending FV consumption for mental health.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38754/
Source: PubMed
Does fruit and vegetable consumption impact mental health? Systematic review and meta-analyses of published controlled intervention studies
Authors: Appleton, K.M., Boxall, L.R., Adenuga-Ajayi, O. and Seyar, D.F.
Journal: BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume: 131
Issue: 1
Pages: 163-173
eISSN: 1475-2662
ISSN: 0007-1145
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114523001423
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38754/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Does fruit and vegetable consumption impact mental health? Systematic review and meta-analyses of published controlled intervention studies.
Authors: Appleton, K.M., Boxall, L.R., Adenuga-Ajayi, O. and Seyar, D.F.
Journal: The British journal of nutrition
Volume: 131
Issue: 1
Pages: 163-173
eISSN: 1475-2662
ISSN: 0007-1145
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114523001423
Abstract:Associations between fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption and mental health are suggested, largely from observational studies. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarise all published controlled intervention studies investigating the effects of FV consumption on mental health in adults. Four academic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched on 16 September 2022, over all years, for studies that used an intervention design; included FV consumption; included an appropriate non-FV-consumption control; used a validated measure of mental health and were conducted in healthy adults or adults with solely a depressive or anxiety-related condition. Study details were tabulated and combined using meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the domains of the Cochrane Collaboration. Six studies, enrolling 691 healthy adults and reporting on one or more mental health outcomes, were found. Meta-analyses found small and imprecise effects of FV consumption for: psychological well-being (4 studies, 289 participants) standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0·07 (95 % CI -0·17, 0·30), P = 0·58, I2 = 0 %; depressive symptomology (3 studies, 271 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·40, 0·10), P = 0·23, I2 = 47 % and anxiety-related symptomology (4 studies, 298 participants) SMD = -0·15 (95 % CI -0·39, 0·08), P = 0·20, I2 = 71 %. Some benefit for psychological well-being was found in change-from-baseline data: SMD = 0·28 (95 % CI 0·05, 0·52), P = 0·02, I2 = 0 %. Risk of bias was high in many studies. Limitations include the consideration only of published studies and stem from the studies found. Given the few, limited studies available and the small size of effects, stronger evidence is needed before recommending FV consumption for mental health.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38754/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Does fruit and vegetable consumption impact mental health? Systematic review and meta-analysis of published controlled intervention studies.
Authors: Appleton, K.M., Boxall, L.R., Adenuga-Ajayi, O. and Seyar, D.F.
Journal: British Journal of Nutrition
Volume: 131
Pages: 163-173
ISSN: 0007-1145
Abstract:Associations between fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption and mental health are suggested, largely from observational studies. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarize all published controlled intervention studies investigating the effects of FV consumption on mental health in adults. Four academic databases (Medline, PsychInfo, Pubmed, Web of Science) were searched on 16.09.22, over all years, for studies that: used an intervention design; included fruit and/or vegetable consumption; included an appropriate non-FV-consumption control; used a validated measure of mental health; and were conducted in healthy adults or adults with solely a depressive or anxiety-related condition. Study details were tabulated and combined using meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the domains of the Cochrane Collaboration. Six studies, enrolling 691 healthy adults, and reporting on one or more mental health outcomes were found. Meta-analyses found small and imprecise effects of FV consumption: Psychological Well-being (4 studies, 289 participants) SMD=0.07 (95% confidence intervals (95%CI) -0.17, 0.30), p=0.58, I2=0%; Depressive Symptomology (3 studies, 271 participants) SMD=-0.15 (95%CI -0.40, 0.10), p=0.23, I2=46%; Anxiety-related Symptomology (4 studies, 298 participants) SMD=-0.15 (95%CI -0.39, 0.08), p=0.20, I2=69%. Some benefit for Psychological Well-being was found in change-from-baseline data: SMD=0.28 (95%CI 0.04, 0.52), p=0.02, I2=0%). Risk of bias was high in many studies. Limitations include the consideration only of published studies, and stem from the studies found. Given the few, limited studies available and the small size of effects, stronger evidence is needed before recommending FV consumption for mental health.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38754/
Source: BURO EPrints