The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent
Authors: Leong, B.Q.Z., Hussain Ismail, A.M., Wong, H.K. and Estudillo, A.J.
Journal: Cognitive Neuropsychology
eISSN: 1464-0627
ISSN: 0264-3294
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2371384
Abstract:Although it is generally assumed that face recognition relies on holistic processing, whether face recognition deficits observed in Developmental Prosopagnosics (DPs) can be explained by impaired holistic processing is currently under debate. The mixed findings from past studies could be the consequence of DP’s heterogeneous deficit nature and the use of different measures of holistic processing—the inversion, part-whole, and composite tasks—which showed a poor association among each other. The present study aimed to gain further insight into the role of holistic processing in DPs. Groups of DPs and neurotypicals completed three tests measuring holistic face processing and non-face objects (i.e., Navon task). At a group level, DPs showed (1) diminished, but not absent, inversion and part-whole effects, (2) comparable magnitudes of the composite face effect and (3) global precedence effect in the Navon task. However, single-case analyses showed that these holistic processing deficits in DPs are heterogeneous.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: Scopus
The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent.
Authors: Leong, B.Q.Z., Hussain Ismail, A.M., Wong, H.K. and Estudillo, A.J.
Journal: Cogn Neuropsychol
Pages: 1-19
eISSN: 1464-0627
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2371384
Abstract:Although it is generally assumed that face recognition relies on holistic processing, whether face recognition deficits observed in Developmental Prosopagnosics (DPs) can be explained by impaired holistic processing is currently under debate. The mixed findings from past studies could be the consequence of DP's heterogeneous deficit nature and the use of different measures of holistic processing-the inversion, part-whole, and composite tasks-which showed a poor association among each other. The present study aimed to gain further insight into the role of holistic processing in DPs. Groups of DPs and neurotypicals completed three tests measuring holistic face processing and non-face objects (i.e., Navon task). At a group level, DPs showed (1) diminished, but not absent, inversion and part-whole effects, (2) comparable magnitudes of the composite face effect and (3) global precedence effect in the Navon task. However, single-case analyses showed that these holistic processing deficits in DPs are heterogeneous.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: PubMed
The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent
Authors: Leong, B.Q.Z., Ismail, A.M.H., Wong, H.K. and Estudillo, A.J.
Journal: COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
eISSN: 1464-0627
ISSN: 0264-3294
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2371384
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent
Authors: Leong Qi Zheng, B., Hussain Ismail, A.M. and Estudillo, A.
Journal: Cognitive Neuropsychology
Pages: 1-19
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0264-3294
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2371384
Abstract:Although it is generally assumed that face recognition relies on holistic processing, whether face recognition deficits observed in Developmental Prosopagnosics (DPs) can be explained by impaired holistic processing is currently under debate. The mixed findings from past studies could be the consequence of DP’s heterogeneous deficit nature and the use of different measures of holistic processing—the inversion, part-whole, and composite tasks—which showed a poor association among each other. The present study aimed to gain further insight into the role of holistic processing in DPs. Groups of DPs and neurotypicals completed three tests measuring holistic face processing and non-face objects (i.e., Navon task). At a group level, DPs showed (1) diminished, but not absent, inversion and part-whole effects, (2) comparable magnitudes of the composite face effect and (3) global precedence effect in the Navon task. However, single-case analyses showed that these holistic processing deficits in DPs are heterogeneous.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: Manual
The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent.
Authors: Leong, B.Q.Z., Hussain Ismail, A.M., Wong, H.K. and Estudillo, A.J.
Journal: Cognitive neuropsychology
Pages: 1-19
eISSN: 1464-0627
ISSN: 0264-3294
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2371384
Abstract:Although it is generally assumed that face recognition relies on holistic processing, whether face recognition deficits observed in Developmental Prosopagnosics (DPs) can be explained by impaired holistic processing is currently under debate. The mixed findings from past studies could be the consequence of DP's heterogeneous deficit nature and the use of different measures of holistic processing-the inversion, part-whole, and composite tasks-which showed a poor association among each other. The present study aimed to gain further insight into the role of holistic processing in DPs. Groups of DPs and neurotypicals completed three tests measuring holistic face processing and non-face objects (i.e., Navon task). At a group level, DPs showed (1) diminished, but not absent, inversion and part-whole effects, (2) comparable magnitudes of the composite face effect and (3) global precedence effect in the Navon task. However, single-case analyses showed that these holistic processing deficits in DPs are heterogeneous.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent
Authors: Leong Qi Zheng, B., Hussain Ismail, A.M., Wong, H.K. and Estudillo, A.J.
Journal: Cognitive Neuropsychology
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0264-3294
Abstract:Although it is generally assumed that face recognition relies on holistic processing, whether face recognition deficits observed in Developmental Prosopagnosics (DPs) can be explained by impaired holistic processing is currently under debate. The mixed findings from past studies could be the consequence of DP’s heterogeneous deficit nature and the use of different measures of holistic processing—the inversion, part-whole, and composite tasks—which showed a poor association among each other. The present study aimed to gain further insight into the role of holistic processing in DPs. Groups of DPs and neurotypicals completed three tests measuring holistic face processing and non-face objects (i.e., Navon task). At a group level, DPs showed (1) diminished, but not absent, inversion and part-whole effects, (2) comparable magnitudes of the composite face effect and (3) global precedence effect in the Navon task. However, single-case analyses showed that these holistic processing deficits in DPs are heterogeneous.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40103/
Source: BURO EPrints