Bridging the gap: enhancing orthopaedic outcomes through qualitative research integration
Authors: Mew, L.E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., Ramasamy, A. and Wainwright, T.W.
Journal: Bone and Joint Open
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
Pages: 953-961
eISSN: 2633-1462
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0145.R1
Abstract:Aims The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehen-sive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature. Methods A bibliometric search of journals’ online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO). Results Of the 7,201 papers reviewed, 136 included qualitative methods (0.1%). There was no significant difference between the journals, apart from Bone & Joint Open, which included 21 studies using qualitative methods, equalling 4% of its published articles. Conclusion This study demonstrates that there is a very low number of qualitative research papers published within trauma and orthopaedic journals. Given the increasing focus on patient outcomes and improving the patient experience, it may be argued that there is a requirement to support both quantitative and qualitative approaches to orthopaedic research. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods may effectively address the complex and personal aspects of patients’ care, ensuring that outcomes align with patient values and enhance overall care quality.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40525/
Source: Scopus
Bridging the gap: enhancing orthopaedic outcomes through qualitative research integration.
Authors: Mew, L.E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., Ramasamy, A. and Wainwright, T.W.
Journal: Bone Jt Open
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
Pages: 953-961
eISSN: 2633-1462
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0145.R1
Abstract:AIMS: The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature. METHODS: A bibliometric search of journals' online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO). RESULTS: Of the 7,201 papers reviewed, 136 included qualitative methods (0.1%). There was no significant difference between the journals, apart from Bone & Joint Open, which included 21 studies using qualitative methods, equalling 4% of its published articles. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there is a very low number of qualitative research papers published within trauma and orthopaedic journals. Given the increasing focus on patient outcomes and improving the patient experience, it may be argued that there is a requirement to support both quantitative and qualitative approaches to orthopaedic research. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods may effectively address the complex and personal aspects of patients' care, ensuring that outcomes align with patient values and enhance overall care quality.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40525/
Source: PubMed
Bridging the gap: enhancing orthopaedic outcomes through qualitative research integration
Authors: Mew, L.E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., Ramasamy, A. and Wainwright, T.W.
Journal: BONE & JOINT OPEN
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
Pages: 953-961
ISSN: 2633-1462
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.511.BJO-2024-0145.R1
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40525/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Bridging the gap: enhancing orthopaedic outcomes through qualitative research integration.
Authors: Mew, L.E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., Ramasamy, A. and Wainwright, T.W.
Journal: Bone & joint open
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
Pages: 953-961
eISSN: 2633-1462
ISSN: 2633-1462
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.511.bjo-2024-0145.r1
Abstract:Aims
The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature.Methods
A bibliometric search of journals' online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO).Results
Of the 7,201 papers reviewed, 136 included qualitative methods (0.1%). There was no significant difference between the journals, apart from Bone & Joint Open, which included 21 studies using qualitative methods, equalling 4% of its published articles.Conclusion
This study demonstrates that there is a very low number of qualitative research papers published within trauma and orthopaedic journals. Given the increasing focus on patient outcomes and improving the patient experience, it may be argued that there is a requirement to support both quantitative and qualitative approaches to orthopaedic research. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods may effectively address the complex and personal aspects of patients' care, ensuring that outcomes align with patient values and enhance overall care quality.https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40525/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Bridging the gap: enhancing orthopaedic outcomes through qualitative research integration.
Authors: Mew, L.E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., Ramasamy, A. and Wainwright, T.W.
Journal: Bone & Joint Open
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
Pages: 953-961
ISSN: 2633-1462
Abstract:AIMS: The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature. METHODS: A bibliometric search of journals' online archives and multiple databases was undertaken in March 2024, to identify articles using qualitative research methods in the top 12 trauma and orthopaedic journals based on the 2023 impact factor and SCImago rating. The bibliometric search was conducted and reported in accordance with the preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO). RESULTS: Of the 7,201 papers reviewed, 136 included qualitative methods (0.1%). There was no significant difference between the journals, apart from Bone & Joint Open, which included 21 studies using qualitative methods, equalling 4% of its published articles. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there is a very low number of qualitative research papers published within trauma and orthopaedic journals. Given the increasing focus on patient outcomes and improving the patient experience, it may be argued that there is a requirement to support both quantitative and qualitative approaches to orthopaedic research. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods may effectively address the complex and personal aspects of patients' care, ensuring that outcomes align with patient values and enhance overall care quality.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40525/
Source: BURO EPrints