Exploring the ethical imagination: Conversation as practice versus committee as gatekeeper
Authors: Redwood, S. and Todres, L.
Journal: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
Volume: 7
Issue: 2
eISSN: 1438-5627
ISSN: 1438-5627
Abstract:This conversation (from which some excerpts are reproduced below) was part of the preparatory work for my (Sabi) doctorate in education in which I focus on ethical decision-making in qualitative research in health care settings. Les and I hope that readers who share our concerns about how qualitative studies are reviewed may contribute to this dialogue so that, as a community of researchers, we can start to think and speak differently about ethics and ethical decision-making in qualitative research. Thinking and speaking differently, we hope, may bring about changes in the review processes to make them more congruent with the values of our work and reflect more faithfully the tensions and dilemmas we, and our students, face in our practice. © 2006 FQS.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/1212/
Source: Scopus
Exploring the ethical imagination: conversation as practice versus committee as gatekeeper
Authors: Redwood, S. and Todres, L.
Journal: Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Volume: 7
Pages: 38-45
ISSN: 1438-5627
Abstract:This conversation (from which some excerpts are reproduced below) was part of the preparatory work for my (Sabi) doctorate in education in which I focus on ethical decision-making in qualitative research in health care settings. Les and I hope that readers who share our concerns about how qualitative studies are reviewed may contribute to this dialogue so that, as a community of researchers, we can start to think and speak differently about ethics and ethical decision-making in qualitative research. Thinking and speaking differently, we hope, may bring about changes in the review processes to make them more congruent with the values of our work and reflect more faithfully the tensions and dilemmas we, and our students, face in our practice.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/1212/
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-06/06-2-34-e.htm
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Les Todres
Exploring the ethical imagination: conversation as practice versus committee as gatekeeper
Authors: Redwood, S. and Todres, L.
Journal: Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Volume: 7
Issue: 2
Pages: 38-45
ISSN: 1438-5627
Abstract:This conversation (from which some excerpts are reproduced below) was part of the preparatory work for my (Sabi) doctorate in education in which I focus on ethical decision-making in qualitative research in health care settings. Les and I hope that readers who share our concerns about how qualitative studies are reviewed may contribute to this dialogue so that, as a community of researchers, we can start to think and speak differently about ethics and ethical decision-making in qualitative research. Thinking and speaking differently, we hope, may bring about changes in the review processes to make them more congruent with the values of our work and reflect more faithfully the tensions and dilemmas we, and our students, face in our practice.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/1212/
http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-06/06-2-34-e.htm
Source: BURO EPrints