Staff Profile Pages

What’s Wrong with the Feedback?

Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J. and Prakoonwit, S.

Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volume: 10345 LNCS

Pages: 251-261

eISSN: 1611-3349

ISSN: 0302-9743

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_27

Abstract:

It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/

Source: Scopus

What's Wrong with the Feedback?

Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J. and Prakoonwit, S.

Journal: E-LEARNING AND GAMES, EDUTAINMENT 2017

Volume: 10345

Pages: 251-261

eISSN: 1611-3349

ISSN: 0302-9743

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_27

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

What’s Wrong with the Feedback?

Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K.P., Fonseca, J.F. and Prakoonwit, S.P.

Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Publisher: Springer Link

ISSN: 0302-9743

Abstract:

It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0

Source: Manual

Preferred by: Alain Simons

What's Wrong with the Feedback?

Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J.A.S. and Prakoonwit, S.

Editors: Tian, F., Gatzidis, C., Rhalibi, A.E., Tang, W. and Charles, F.

Journal: Edutainment

Volume: 10345

Pages: 251-261

Publisher: Springer

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0

Source: DBLP

What’s Wrong with the Feedback?

Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J.A.S. and Prakoonwit, S.

Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract:

It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/

Source: BURO EPrints