What’s Wrong with the Feedback?
Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J. and Prakoonwit, S.
Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume: 10345 LNCS
Pages: 251-261
eISSN: 1611-3349
ISSN: 0302-9743
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_27
Abstract:It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/
Source: Scopus
What's Wrong with the Feedback?
Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J. and Prakoonwit, S.
Journal: E-LEARNING AND GAMES, EDUTAINMENT 2017
Volume: 10345
Pages: 251-261
eISSN: 1611-3349
ISSN: 0302-9743
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_27
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
What’s Wrong with the Feedback?
Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K.P., Fonseca, J.F. and Prakoonwit, S.P.
Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher: Springer Link
ISSN: 0302-9743
Abstract:It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Alain Simons
What's Wrong with the Feedback?
Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J.A.S. and Prakoonwit, S.
Editors: Tian, F., Gatzidis, C., Rhalibi, A.E., Tang, W. and Charles, F.
Journal: Edutainment
Volume: 10345
Pages: 251-261
Publisher: Springer
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0
Source: DBLP
What’s Wrong with the Feedback?
Authors: Simons, A., Pedersen, K., Fonseca, J.A.S. and Prakoonwit, S.
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract:It has already been for a while that educational institutions and researchers tried to find an answer to the recurrent critics of learners on how feedback is delivered. Many emerging technologies have been used with a limited success, therefore there must be some other factors. What we learned from observing different feedback was that written feedback is not very attractive. Most of the feedback was not enjoyable to consult or difficult to access. This research proposes an answer to how to make feedback more appealing, especially when artefacts are submitted, and formulate some recommendations to develop an effective feedback tool. This research is not aiming for feedback on written reports where tools such as Turnitin are sufficient.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30970/
Source: BURO EPrints