3D mass customization toolkits design, Part I: Survey and an evaluation model

Authors: Zhao, H., McLoughlin, L., Adzhiev, V. and Pasko, A.

Journal: Computer-Aided Design and Applications

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 204-222

ISSN: 1686-4360

DOI: 10.14733/cadaps.2019.204-222

Abstract:

Mass customization (MC) allows consumers to design their own products or services through online MC toolkits. The application of geometric modeling through modern web-browsers allows for the presentation of a virtual 3D product, resulting in a number of commercial 3D MC sites. To gain a deeper understanding of the toolkits that drive these sites, this article provides a comprehensive investigation into web-based toolkit design. Based on this review, an evaluation model for 3D MC toolkits is proposed that considers four aspects: Individual Differences, Solution Space, Interaction Design and Enabling Technologies. This leads to a follow-up article that applies the 3D toolkit evaluation model to assess commercial 3D toolkits which are available on the current market.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31313/

Source: Scopus

3D Mass Customization Toolkits Design, Part I: Survey and an Evaluation Model

Authors: Zhao, H., McLoughlin, L., Adzhiev, V. and Pasko, A.

Journal: Computer-Aided Design & Applications

Publisher: Taylor & Francis

ISSN: 1686-4360

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31313/

Source: Manual

3D Mass Customization Toolkits Design, Part I: Survey and an Evaluation Model

Authors: Zhao, H., McLoughlin, L., Adzhiev, V. and Pasko, A.

Journal: Computer-Aided Design & Applications

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 204-222

ISSN: 1686-4360

Abstract:

Mass customization (MC) allows consumers to design their own products or services through online MC toolkits. The application of geometric modeling through modern web-browsers allows for the presentation of a virtual 3D product, resulting in a number of commercial 3D MC sites. To gain a deeper understanding of the toolkits that drive these sites, this article provides a comprehensive investigation into web-based toolkit design. Based on this review, an evaluation model for 3D MC toolkits is proposed that considers four aspects: Individual Differences, Solution Space, Interaction Design and Enabling Technologies. This leads to a follow-up article that applies the 3D toolkit evaluation model to assess commercial 3D toolkits which are available on the current market.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31313/

Source: BURO EPrints