Disaster Risk Reduction in Cameroon: Are Contemporary Disaster Management Frameworks Accommodating the Sendai Framework Agenda 2030?

Authors: Bang, H.N., Miles, L.S. and Gordon, R.D.

Journal: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Volume: 10

Issue: 4

Pages: 462-477

eISSN: 2192-6395

ISSN: 2095-0055

DOI: 10.1007/s13753-019-00238-w

Abstract:

Many African countries are prone to numerous hazardous events, exacerbated by the vulnerability of their rapidly increasing population and leading to frequent disasters that often have dire fiscal and development implications. Yet, there is declining sensitivity to these risks, contrary to the conventional wisdom of disaster management (DM) principles. The primary aim of this research is to understand the constraints and/or challenges limiting the ability of contemporary African DM systems/institutional frameworks from implementing adequate disaster risk reduction (DRR) measures. Using a qualitative, case study based research strategy, this research investigates resistance to the effective implementation of DM/DRR within Cameroon’s contemporary DM system by using the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 guiding principles for DRR as benchmark. The findings reveal the existence of resistance factors that particularly complicate the communication, decision making, and coordination of DRR activities, the provision of resources, aspects of international assistance, as well as DRR planning and policies. The authors argue that such resistance factors contribute to making Cameroon’s DM system more reactive and further undermine risk reduction. The article concludes by offering key recommendations that have the potential to alleviate the identified resistance factors as well as strengthen Cameroon’s DM, particularly in relation to capacity building, training, research development, and organizational resilience.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32846/

Source: Scopus

Disaster Risk Reduction in Cameroon: Are Contemporary Disaster Management Frameworks Accommodating the Sendai Framework Agenda 2030?

Authors: Bang, H.N., Miles, L.S. and Gordon, R.D.

Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE

Volume: 10

Issue: 4

Pages: 462-477

eISSN: 2192-6395

ISSN: 2095-0055

DOI: 10.1007/s13753-019-00238-w

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32846/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Disaster Risk Reduction in Cameroon: Are Contemporary Disaster Management Frameworks Accommodating the Sendai Framework Agenda 2030?

Authors: Bang, H., Miles, L. and Gordon, R.

Journal: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Publisher: Springer

ISSN: 2095-0055

DOI: 10.1007/s13753-019-00238-w

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32846/

Source: Manual

Disaster Risk Reduction in Cameroon: Are Contemporary Disaster Management Frameworks Accommodating the Sendai Framework Agenda 2030?

Authors: Bang, H., Miles, L. and Gordon, R.

Journal: International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Volume: 10

Pages: 462-477

ISSN: 2095-0055

Abstract:

Many African countries are prone to numerous hazardous events, exacerbated by the vulnerability of their rapidly increasing population and leading to frequent disasters that often have dire fiscal and development implications. Yet, there is declining sensitivity to these risks, contrary to the conventional wisdom of disaster management (DM) principles. The primary aim of this research is to understand the constraints and/or challenges limiting the ability of contemporary African DM systems/institutional frameworks from implementing adequate disaster risk reduction (DRR) measures. Using a qualitative, case study based research strategy, this research investigates resistance to the effective implementation of DM/DRR within Cameroon’s contemporary DM system by using the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 guiding principles for DRR as benchmark. The findings reveal the existence of resistance factors that particularly complicate the communication, decision making, and coordination of DRR activities, the provision of resources, aspects of international assistance, as well as DRR planning and policies. The authors argue that such resistance factors contribute to making Cameroon’s DM system more reactive and further undermine risk reduction. The article concludes by offering key recommendations that have the potential to alleviate the identified resistance factors as well as strengthen Cameroon’s DM, particularly in relation to capacity building, training, research development, and organizational resilience.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32846/

Source: BURO EPrints