Assessing the Impact of Sensor Orientation on Accelerometer-Derived Angles: A Systematic Analysis and Proposed Error Reduction
Authors: Mcclintock, F.A., Callaway, A.J., Clark, C.J. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume: 14
Issue: 2
eISSN: 2076-3417
DOI: 10.3390/app14020842
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39494/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Assessing the Impact of Sensor Orientation on Accelerometer-Derived Angles: A Systematic Analysis and Proposed Error Reduction
Authors: McClintock, F., Callaway, A., Clark, C. and Williams, J.
Journal: Applied Sciences
Volume: 14
Issue: 2
Pages: 842
Publisher: MDPI AG
ISSN: 2076-3417
DOI: 10.3390/app14020842
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39494/
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/2/842
Source: Manual
Assessing the Impact of Sensor Orientation on Accelerometer-Derived Angles: A Systematic Analysis and Proposed Error Reduction
Authors: McClintock, F.A., Callaway, A.J., Clark, C.J. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: Applied Sciences
Volume: 14
Issue: 2
Publisher: MDPI AG
ISSN: 2076-3417
Abstract:Accelerometers have been widely used for motion analysis. The effect of initial sensor orientation (ISO) on the derived range of motion (ROM) is currently unexplored, limiting clarity in understanding error. This two-step study systematically explored the effect of ISO on the error of accelerometer-derived range of motion (ROM) and the effect of a proposed correction algorithm. Accelerometer data were used to compute peak and through-range ROM across a range of ISO and movement angular velocities up to 148° s−1 compared to an optoelectronic gold-standard. Step 1 demonstrated that error increased linearly with increasing ISO offsets and angular velocity. Average peak ROM RMSE at an ISO of 20° tilt and twist was 5.9° for sagittal motion, and for an ISO of 50° pitch and 20° twist, it was 7.5° for frontal plane ROM. Through-range RMSE demonstrated errors of 7–8° for similar ISOs. Predictive modeling estimated a 3.2° and 3.7° increase in peak and through-range sagittal plane error for every 10° increase in tilt and twist ISO. Step 2 demonstrated error reduction utilizing mathematical correction for ISO, resulting in <1° mean peak error and <1.2° mean through-range ROM error regardless of ISO. Accelerometers can be used to measure cardinal plane joint angles, but initial orientation is a source of error unless corrected.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39494/
Source: BURO EPrints