The up-down-up pandemic news experience: A mixed-method approach to its negative and positive effects on psychological wellbeing
Authors: Nguyen, A., Glück, A. and Jackson, D.
Journal: Journalism
Volume: 24
Issue: 12
Pages: 2687-2704
eISSN: 1741-3001
ISSN: 1464-8849
DOI: 10.1177/14648849221135137
Abstract:Existing research has documented the dynamics of increased news consumption alongside – paradoxically – increased news avoidance during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighting its adverse effects on mental health and emotional wellbeing. However, for methodological and theoretical reasons, research still lacks specifics on what types of negative psychological responses were directly triggered by pandemic news, how prevalent they were in the population, how they manifested in daily life, and what could be the alternatives to them. Further, the almost exclusive focus on negative effects has led to a relative negligence of the positive sides of pandemic news. This study takes a mixed-method approach to address these gaps, combining 59 interviews and a follow-up survey with a representative sample of 2,015 adults across the UK. We found that pandemic news consumption, driven primarily by the need for personalised surveillance in an uncertain situation, oscillated in parallel with its severity and associated lockdown restrictions. The influx of repetitive bad news triggered many negative feelings besides general pandemic anxiety – namely fear, despair and moral outage (anger and disgust). This led to various alterations of daily routines, including news avoidance. Such adverse effects were offset by the reassurance, happiness and hope that the news did, at least occasionally, brought to audiences during the pandemic. Participants suggested several potential “good news” categories that point to the need for constructive news forms that not only inform but also inspire, motivate and/or empower people in personal or collective ways.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37651/
Source: Scopus
The up-down-up pandemic news experience: A mixed-method approach to its negative and positive effects on psychological wellbeing
Authors: An, N., Gluck, A. and Jackson, D.
Journal: JOURNALISM
Volume: 24
Issue: 12
Pages: 2687-2704
eISSN: 1741-3001
ISSN: 1464-8849
DOI: 10.1177/14648849221135137
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37651/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
The up-down-up pandemic news experience: a mixed-method approach to its negative and positive effects on psychological wellbeing
Authors: Nguyen, A., Glück, A. and Jackson, D.
Journal: Journalism: theory, practice and criticism
Publisher: SAGE
ISSN: 1464-8849
Abstract:Existing research has documented the dynamics of increased news consumption alongside – paradoxically – increased news avoidance during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighting its adverse effects on mental health and emotional wellbeing. However, for methodological and theoretical reasons, research still lacks specifics on what types of negative psychological responses were directly triggered by pandemic news, how prevalent they were in the population, how they manifested in daily life, and what could be the alternatives to them. Further, the almost exclusive focus on negative effects has led to a relative negligence of the positive sides of pandemic news. This study takes a mixed-method approach to address these gaps, combining 59 interviews and a follow-up survey with a representative sample of 2,015 adults across the UK. We found that pandemic news consumption, driven primarily by the need for personalised surveillance in an uncertain situation, oscillated in parallel with its severity and associated lockdown restrictions. The influx of repetitive bad news triggered many negative feelings besides general pandemic anxiety – namely fear, despair and moral outage (anger and disgust). This led to various alterations of daily routines, including news avoidance. Such adverse effects were offset by the reassurance, happiness and hope that the news did, at least occasionally, brought to audiences during the pandemic. Participants suggested several potential “good news” categories that point to the need for constructive news forms that not only inform but also inspire, motivate and/or empower people in personal or collective ways.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37651/
Source: Manual
The up-down-up pandemic news experience: a mixed-method approach to its negative and positive effects on psychological wellbeing
Authors: Nguyen, A., Glück, A. and Jackson, D.
Journal: Journalism
Publisher: SAGE
ISSN: 1464-8849
Abstract:Existing research has documented the dynamics of increased news consumption alongside – paradoxically – increased news avoidance during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighting its adverse effects on mental health and emotional wellbeing. However, for methodological and theoretical reasons, research still lacks specifics on what types of negative psychological responses were directly triggered by pandemic news, how prevalent they were in the population, how they manifested in daily life, and what could be the alternatives to them. Further, the almost exclusive focus on negative effects has led to a relative negligence of the positive sides of pandemic news. This study takes a mixed-method approach to address these gaps, combining 59 interviews and a follow-up survey with a representative sample of 2,015 adults across the UK. We found that pandemic news consumption, driven primarily by the need for personalised surveillance in an uncertain situation, oscillated in parallel with its severity and associated lockdown restrictions. The influx of repetitive bad news triggered many negative feelings besides general pandemic anxiety – namely fear, despair and moral outage (anger and disgust). This led to various alterations of daily routines, including news avoidance. Such adverse effects were offset by the reassurance, happiness and hope that the news did, at least occasionally, brought to audiences during the pandemic. Participants suggested several potential “good news” categories that point to the need for constructive news forms that not only inform but also inspire, motivate and/or empower people in personal or collective ways.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37651/
https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal/journalism
Source: BURO EPrints